• If you are citizen of an European Union member nation, you may not use this service unless you are at least 16 years old.

View
 

Decisions About Using Technology

Page history last edited by Jamie Dalton 13 years, 10 months ago

Decisions About Using Technology

 

Introduction 

     In recent years, school districts, universities, and corporations have placed a great deal of importance on the utilization and integration of instructional technology. However, for many educators this has proven to be a daunting and seemingly insurmountable goal. Experienced educators, as well as those new to the field, often experience difficulty in determining the most effective and efficient ways to use technology to meet their curricular goals and enhance student learning. This document is designed to help educators meet their technology integration goals and will guide them through the decision-making process.

 

     First, it is important to define technology integration and discuss its purposes and ultimate goals. According to Lorrie Jackson (2002), "integrating technology means simply using technology within the existing curriculum". She contends that technology should not replace current lessons and curricula, but rather should be used as a tool to support and enhance them. Expert contributors on the Edutopia Website further this idea by contending that "effective tech integration must happen across the curriculum in ways that research shows deepen and enhance the learning process" (Edutopia Website, "Why integrate technology into the curriculum?"). In addition, they assert that the overall goal of technology integration is to "support four key components of learning: active engagement, participation in groups, frequent interaction and feedback, and connection to real-world experts" (Edutopia Website, "Why integrate technology into the curriculum?").

 

     Next, it is necessary to determine which technologies best support these goals and how they can be utilized in the classroom. As a field we tend to be fad-driven, so often we see the in-service offerings and technologies chosen to go along with what are perceived as the latest trends. A better strategy, of course, would be to look at the actual strengths, weaknesses, and needs of the students, teachers, and institutions.   

 

Our goals are to:

  • Provide guidance and working/nonworking examples to teachers as they choose technology tools to incorporate into their instruction.
  • Provide guidance and working/nonworking examples to teachers as they consider technology that can assist with lesson planning and record keeping.
  • Provide guidance and working/nonworking examples to administrators as they make decisions about new technology purchases.

 

 

     An additional important component that relates to the use of technology in schools is communication with outside constituencies.  As Susan Brooks-Young outlines in her book Critical Technology Issues for School Leaders(2006), parents and community members also have expectations for up-to-date technology uses, such as receiving online communications through e-mail, classroom Web sites, telephone messaging systems, blogs and homework pages.  Technology plans cannot just focus on inside-the-classroom use, but must also incorporate an infrastructure for presenting the school to external constituents as well.  Many of these are referenced on the "Technology Resources to Consider" page.

 

Here is the list of members for this group as of October 10:

 

Ashley Kistler

Carolyn Petite

Denise Goble

Elizabeth Slanina

Jamie Dalton Rhoads

Jennifer Ellis

Jennifer Hall 

Jennifer Schmidt

Jody (Eleanor) Kistler

Karen Gedeon

Keri Stoyle

Nancy Vondrak

Rochelle Croston

Sarah Kuholski

 

     Contributors to this wiki created a number of tools designed to assist educators in making decisions about technology. The Decision Maker Tool, in the form of a Quandry Maze, leads educators to age-appropriate technology tools and resources.

 

DecisionMaker.htm - made using information contributed on this page: Interactive Decision Making Tool

 Decision Making for elementarymiddle school, and high school.

 

Based on the goals of this document, this page has a list of questions to consider in order to help guide educatos in decision making. Questions to Consider

 

     Additionally, the following tables will assist educators in determining which types of technology tools will best meet their needs. Also included is a description of the minimum skills that are required for the successful use of specific technology tools. 

 

Technology Resources to Consider - 21st Century Skills for students

Technology Resources to Consider Part Two - Minimum skills to acquire for both students and teachers

Technology Resources to Consider Part Three - Using different media tools to determine which skills to be met 

 

 

 

References for Decisions about Using Technology - List of references

 

 

Pages Used in Development

Interactive Decision Making Tool  - Record of group contributions and information used in creation of the Quandry Maze

 

Original Decisions About Using Technology 

Comments (12)

NancyVondrak said

at 9:54 pm on Oct 17, 2010

When Jennifer mentioned the use of focus groups in her comment I wondered why education doesn't use focus groups . . . or do they? This is something that I will investigate. I'm not sure what I'll find, but it's an avenue.

rochelle croston said

at 8:12 am on Oct 22, 2010

I thought I would start a table of our thoughts and we can add information to it as we find it. If anyone has a better idea feel free to change it. I am a visual learner and it helps me focus on the goal. Feel free to change it or make suggestions. Thanks! Rochelle

rochelle croston said

at 8:18 am on Oct 22, 2010

Karen I added your link to give people an example to get started! Again feel free to add change or whatever.

Elizabeth Slanina said

at 7:44 pm on Oct 24, 2010

I like the tables; I think they break the page up well. I also added another article... do we want more resources?

Sarah Kuholski said

at 3:47 pm on Oct 25, 2010

I agree Elizabeth, it makes it easier to pull information from than just a page of text. I get that the left hand column has the main topics, but are the additional columns on the right all just for items within those topics? Or are there headers that should be on those columns? Just seems like two different formats from the minimum requirement of skills (which uses a different box for each item), to the references (which has them all in the same column).

Jamie Dalton said

at 8:45 am on Oct 29, 2010

I am wondering if we need to include the three goals in the table somehow? Or maybe re-organize it into those three categories with the other rows as sub categories?

jjts said

at 1:05 pm on Oct 30, 2010

wow - great stuff here! Reading down through the page I am wondering if we could have 3 'pages' beyond the intro. 1 page for the quandary maze as a decision tool. 1 page for the list of questions to ask that Jamie posted. 1 page for the table that relates to Dr. Tiene's class. This would offer 3 options for making technology decisions that are sound instructional choices.

I can help with quandary...I've made some mazes for my instructional website from Dr. Ingram's summer class.

rochelle croston said

at 1:21 pm on Oct 31, 2010

I think that is an excellent idea the three pages. the table the questions and the quandry decision making tool. yes! excellent!

akistle3 said

at 6:51 pm on Oct 31, 2010

Sorry guys, I haven't been getting the emails about this being updated so I thought people were not moving on it. Please let me know what you would like me to help with.

Jamie Dalton said

at 12:03 pm on Nov 2, 2010

I really like this idea too! I think this will help organize everything a little better also. I have never used a quandary before, but it sounds like a great tool!

rochelle croston said

at 7:51 pm on Nov 8, 2010

Hello group I made a reference page when I originally named it references it kept linking me to another groups references so I had to be specific and name it what I named it. So please don't change. Thanks! Rochelle

Denise Goble said

at 5:00 pm on Dec 13, 2010

Hi all, Quick request. Can we please keep the page named Interactive Decision Making Tool on the page? This was our working document and shows the complete history of the contributions made to the Quandry maze. Thanks!

You don't have permission to comment on this page.